|
Traditional
Approach

|
 |
|
Top View
|
Side
View
|
|
|
|
- many
cabinets
- low
"per-cabinet cost" -
but HIGH total system cost
- dome
tweeter or "no-tweeter" approach cannot compete
with background noise
- susceptible
to failure from paging / music peaks
- narrow
dispersion pattern
- lots
of wiring / installation labor
- poor
fidelity / "strained" sound
|
|
|
|
Technomad
Approach
 |
 |
|
Top View
|
Side
View
|
|
|
|
-
few
cabinets
-
higher
"per-cabinet cost -
but LOW total system cost
-
ceramic
HF driver project better in large spaces
-
built
in peak protection circuitry
-
very
wide dispersion pattern = better coverage
-
greatly
reduced wiring and install labor
-
outstanding
fidelity and operating headroom
|
|
|
|